Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Home > Schneider Electric > Cost, Speed, and Reliability Tradeoffs between N+1 UPS Configurations

Cost, Speed, and Reliability Tradeoffs between N+1 UPS Configurations

White Paper Published By: Schneider Electric
Schneider Electric
Published:  Nov 11, 2016
Type:  White Paper
Length:  12 pages

There is an increasing trend towards N+1 UPS architectures – rather than 2N – as IT fault tolerance through software continues to improve.

There are two common ways N+1 can be achieved: paralleling multiple unitary UPSs together or deploying a single UPS frame with multiple internal modules configured for N+1 redundancy. In this paper, we quantify key tradeoffs between an internal “modular” redundant UPS and parallel redundant UPSs, and show a 27% capital cost savings and a 1-2 week decrease in deployment time when internal redundancy is deployed.

Discussed here is the importance of fault tolerance within the UPS to ensure availability, reliability, and maintainability needs are met.

Tags :