Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Home > Cisco > Comparative Analysis of Cisco Catalyst 4500E and Brocade FastIron SX 1600

Comparative Analysis of Cisco Catalyst 4500E and Brocade FastIron SX 1600

White Paper Published By: Cisco
Published:  Oct 08, 2015
Type:  White Paper
Length:  24 pages

Miercom was engaged to conduct a comparative testing of two high-capacity L2 and L3 network switches: the popular Cisco Catalyst 4500E, and a comparably configured, competitive switch, the FastIron SX 1600, from Brocade Communications Systems.

Miercom executed comprehensive hands-on testing and evaluated the performance of some widely deployed features that are critical for reliable functioning of enterprise networks. The test methodology was developed that was designed to examine various aspects of the switches. The switches were tested side-by-side in September 2014.

This report summarizes the results of the testing in these areas:

  • Switching-fabric survivability
  • Throughput between 48-port line cards for bi-directional full-load streams between modules
  • Ability to handle data bursts without dropping packets
  • IPv6 Forwarding Information Base capacity
Download this report now to understand the results of the testing.

Tags : 
network switches, communications systems, cisco catalyst, enterprise applications, infrastructure, network architecture, network management, network performance, quality of service, server hardware