Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

sections
Home > Cisco > Complexity and Cost Comparison: Cisco UCS vs IBM Flex System
 

Complexity and Cost Comparison: Cisco UCS vs IBM Flex System

White Paper Published By: Cisco
Cisco
Published:  May 21, 2015
Type:  White Paper
Length:  20 pages

Not all IT architectures are created equal. Whether you are updating your existing infrastructure or building from the ground up, choosing a solution that eases deployment and streamlines management while keeping costs down is a wise choice.

Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) and IBM Flex System both offer tools to streamline deployment and management of your IT infrastructure, but which does more to help you save in deployment, management, and hardware costs? We evaluated the technical features that both offer, and found that Cisco UCS Unified Fabric architecture and the Cisco UCS Manager help alleviate deployment and management burdens with less hardware and without additional software licensing.



Tags : 
cost comparison, architecture, deployment, ucs, infrastructure, internetworking hardware, network architecture