Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

sections
Home > IBM > Clabby:A Comparison of IBM’s Flex Sys Environments to Traditional Blade Architectures
 

Clabby:A Comparison of IBM’s Flex Sys Environments to Traditional Blade Architectures

White Paper Published By: IBM
IBM
Published:  Jan 09, 2014
Type:  White Paper
Length:  8 pages

In this Research Report, Clabby Analytics takes a closer look at IBM’s Flex System converged architecture. The new Flex System’s advanced blade offering shines compared to its closest rival: traditional blade architecture. Flex System offers superior manageability, faster communications, more storage capacity (using up to eight internal solid state drives [SSDs] per compute node) and better storage management — as well as broader/better physical/virtual system management — than all of today’s leading blade competitors.



Tags : 
clabby analytics, ibm, flex system, architecture, blade architecture, puresystems, pureflex, virtualization, cloud computing