Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

sections
Home > IBM > WP (Clabby): “How Cisco’s UCS Compares to Flex System
 

WP (Clabby): “How Cisco’s UCS Compares to Flex System

White Paper Published By: IBM
IBM
Published:  Jan 09, 2014
Type:  White Paper
Length:  8 pages

Two years ago Clabby Analytics wrote a report that evaluated Cisco’s Unified Computing System (UCS) and revealed shortcomings in the UCS design, stating that Cisco blade environments are “good enough” computing environment. Since then Cisco made improvements to their system design, but the blade market didn’t stand still waiting for them to catch up as IBM announced a new system design: the IBM Flex System. Continue on to this new assessment from Clabby Analytics that compares Cisco’s UCS blade server offering to IBM Flex System’s in a soup-to-nuts evaluation. Also find out how these two major players compare to the competitors in the blade marketplace.



Tags : 
ucs blade server, system manager, cross system, system architecture, virtual machine, cisco, ibm flex system, clabby analytics, integrated systems, pureflex system, platform infrastructure, system security, ibm pureflex, networking, security