Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

Home > Caristix > Rethinking HL7 Integration: Start with the Gaps

Rethinking HL7 Integration: Start with the Gaps

White Paper Published By: Caristix
Published:  May 03, 2013
Type:  White Paper
Length:  11 pages

With integration taking on a critical role due to Meaningful Use and related initiatives, hospital CIOs and healthcare information exchange (HIE) leaders are seeking ways to cost-effectively build out the HL7 interfacing that underpins integration projects.

Decision-makers can opt for the interface engine or other integration technology with the most advanced mapping, filtering, and throughput capabilities on the market. But none of these features matters unless the integration analysts who code the engine can accurately scope the interfaces they need to build. Poor scoping can lead to extended go-live periods, significant maintenance at increased cost, and unhappy clinician end-users who are unable to access the data they need for appropriate patient care.

This white paper covers the following:

- The interfacing lifecycle and why scoping is critical
- Why gaps occur and what to do about them
- The 4 gap types
- How to conduct a gap analysis
- Gap analysis pitfalls and how to avoid them

Tags : 
hl7, integration, interface, midical, heathcare, costs, risks, interfacing project, cio, hospital, integration